FOR SUPERVISORS & FACULTY
Give the work your attention. Not the administration.
A planned review workspace for site supervisors and faculty, with related students, submitted activities, assigned evaluations, and recordings shared with you.
A clear queue for hour review.
Inspect the student's entry, approve the correct record, or return it with an explanation. Keep your review attached to the work it covers.
Approved
4h 15m
Pending
50m
Returned
1h
- Counted submitted (approved + pending)
- 5h 05m
- On-site time, 7 Oct (separate measure, not added)
- 4h 45m
Respond to the moment that matters.
The proposed recording workspace lets authorized reviewers attach written feedback to a point in the session. Students can return to the same moment when reflecting on the feedback.
00:42 · Morgan Ellis
Pause here. What did you notice before asking the next question?
01:18 · Morgan Ellis
Bring this moment to supervision. What other response could you have tried?
Shared with: Morgan Ellis (reviewer)
Keep responsibilities explicit.
Site supervisors and faculty share parts of the process without becoming interchangeable roles.
Site supervisors
Review related student activity, complete assigned forms, and manage permitted client-upload requests.
Faculty
Review assigned students, complete program evaluations, and approve activity routed to them.
Primary and co-faculty
Both may review eligible work; primary-faculty agreement duties remain distinct.
A live invitation is not a recording share.
The planned access model treats joining a meeting and reviewing its recording as separate permissions. Recordings are opened only through the access granted for that review.
Read the privacy approach →See how supervision would work for your team.
Walk through an example student, an hour correction, and a session review using fictional records.